[Home ] [Archive]    
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: year 17, Issue 68 (9-2025) ::
3 2025, 17(68): 35-40 Back to browse issues page
Fungal Infections in the Immunocompromised Patient - Section 4
Mohammad Ghahri
Abstract:   (29 Views)
The net state of immunosuppression is a complex function determined by the interplay of a number of factors: The driving force is the dose, duration, and sequence in which immunosuppressive drugs are used; the presence of immune deficiencies unrelated to treatment (e.g., those associated with underlying disease, as well as acquired deficiencies such as acquired hypoglobulinemia associated with intensive therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate); Compromised mucosal surfaces of the skin, such that the function of these protective surfaces is impaired; the severity and degree of neutropenia; metabolic disorders (protein-calorie malnutrition and perhaps diabetes and uremia); very young or very old age; infection with one of the immunomodulating viruses (cytomegalovirus or CMV, Epstein-Barr virus EBV, hepatitis viruses, and human immunodeficiency virus); and possibly race.
In the case of fungal infections, not only does the increased incidence of opportunistic infections but also the decreased severity of signs and symptoms make clinical diagnosis of invasive disease difficult, increasing the burden on the organism and requiring long-term treatment courses.
Immunomodulating viruses, such as CMV, in particular, plays a significant role in the pure state of immunosuppression, with 90% of opportunistic infections occurring in patients with active infection with one or more of these viruses. Indeed, the occurrence of an invasive fungal infection in a patient without viral replication is a clue to exposure to an unknown environmental agent.
The possibility of developing a fungal infection after transplantation is divided into three time periods: the first month after transplantation, the period 1 to 6 months after transplantation, and the period more than 6 months after transplantation. This time frame can be useful in three ways: In establishing a differential diagnosis in a transplant recipient who presents with a clinical infectious disease.
Present early in the post-transplant period with invasive candidiasis, cryptococcal, aspergillosis, or other fungal infections due to previously undiagnosed disease.
Called persistent immunosuppression -in the period of 1 to 6 months- it enables a range of opportunistic infections, including fungi such as Aspergillus species, Pseudosporium species, and Candida species, even in the absence of severe epidemiological exposure.
The vast majority of transplant patients are at relatively low risk of developing invasive fungal infection more than 6 months after transplantation, unless they are exposed to extreme environmental factors.

 
Keywords: Immunocompromised Host, Opportunistic Mycoses, Opportunistic Infections, Invasive Aspergillosis, Candidemia
Full-Text [PDF 707 kb]   (15 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Review | Subject: قارچ شناسی
Received: 2025/09/23 | Accepted: 2025/09/25 | Published: 2025/09/25
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghahri M. Fungal Infections in the Immunocompromised Patient - Section 4. 3 2025; 17 (68) :35-40
URL: http://labdiagnosis.ir/article-1-610-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
year 17, Issue 68 (9-2025) Back to browse issues page
Laboratory and Diagnosis
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4718