[Home ] [Archive]    
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: year 16, Issue 64 (9-2024) ::
3 2024, 16(64): 42-49 Back to browse issues page
The LEAP checklist for laboratory evaluation and analytical performance characteristics reporting of clinical measurement procedures
Tze Ping Loh 1, Brian R Cooke2 , Thi Chi Mai Tai3 , Corey Markus4 , Rosita Zakaria5 , Chung Shun Ho6 , Elvar Theodorsson7 , Ronda F Greaves8
1- Department of Laboratory Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore
2- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia
3- Faculty of Medical Technology, Hanoi Medical University, Vietnam
4- Flinders University International Centre for Point-of-Care Testing, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
5- RMIT University, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
6- Biomedical Mass Spectrometry Unit, Department of Chemical Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong
7- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Clinical Chemistry and Pharmacology, Linkoping University, SE-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
8- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Abstract:   (60 Views)
Reporting a measurement procedure and its analytical performance following method evaluation in a peer-reviewed journal is an important means for clinical laboratory practitioners to share their findings. It also represents an important source of evidence base to help others make informed decisions about their practice. At present, there are significant variations in the information reported in laboratory medicine journal publications describing the analytical performance of measurement procedures. These variations also challenge authors, readers, reviewers, and editors in deciding the quality of a submitted manuscript.
The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group on Method Evaluation Protocols (IFCC WG-MEP) developed a checklist and recommends its adoption to enable a consistent approach to reporting method evaluation and analytical performance characteristics of measurement procedures in laboratory medicine journals. It is envisioned that the LEAP checklist will improve the standardization of journal publications describing method evaluation and analytical performance characteristics, improving the quality of the evidence base that is relied upon by practitioners.
Keywords: Emerging technology(ies), Method verification. Method validation
Full-Text [PDF 426 kb]   (76 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Applicable | Subject: General
Received: 2024/09/23 | Accepted: 2024/09/24 | Published: 2024/09/24
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Loh T P, Cooke B R, Tai T C M, Markus C, Zakaria R, Ho C S, et al . The LEAP checklist for laboratory evaluation and analytical performance characteristics reporting of clinical measurement procedures. 3 2024; 16 (64) :42-49
URL: http://labdiagnosis.ir/article-1-571-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
year 16, Issue 64 (9-2024) Back to browse issues page
Laboratory and Diagnosis
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660